Louis E. Michelson, A Professional Corporation

Providing Legal and Tax Advisory Services to Nonprofit Organizations

Secretary of State Proposed Regulation Changes: Online Statement of Information Filing – Free Electronic Copy

March 16th, 2011 · California filings

On Friday, March 11, 2011, the California Secretary of State published for public comment a proposed regulation change that would authorize the Secretary of State to send (via email to the person submitting the Statement of Information) a free copy of a Statement of Information as it is filed online.  The proposed regulatory change will ensure a business will receive an uncertified electronic copy of their filed Statement of Information when filing a Statement of Information online. The proposed regulatory change also moves existing copy fees to a separate new regulation and clarifies and standardizes terms used within the section. Under authority established in Government Code section 12182, the California Secretary of State proposes to amend section 21903 and add section 21903.5 to Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations.

See the following links for the Public Notice, the Initial Statement of Reasons and the text of the proposed regulations.

Comments Off on Secretary of State Proposed Regulation Changes: Online Statement of Information Filing – Free Electronic CopyTags:

Nonfiler Automatic Revocation List

February 25th, 2011 · Loss of Tax-Exempt Staus

The IRS will soon begin to publish and maintain a list, updated monthly, of organizations that have had their federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked for failing to file an annual information return or notice with the IRS for three consecutive years.  The Nonfiler Revocation List will be available in Adobe and Excel formats, and will be divided into separate lists by jurisdiction.  The list will provide the name, employer identification number (EIN), organization (subsection code), last known address, and effective date of revocation.

At the February 23 meeting of the D.C. Bar Taxation Section, IRS Exempt Organization Director Lois Lerner stated that the EO Office will be revoking thee tax-exemptions of a “sizable number” of small exempt organizations, without providing any figures of what constitutes a sizable number.   Ms. Lerner stated that the IRS has become aware that some larger organizations that are required to filed Form 990 have filed the electronic postcard (Form 990-N) in attempting to meet their filing requirements.  EO will be checking eligibility of filers of the electronic postcard.

Comments Off on Nonfiler Automatic Revocation ListTags:

PTINs for Form 1023/1024 Preparers

February 18th, 2011 · Uncategorized

The following information is provided courtesy of the ABA Section of Taxation’s Exempt Organizations Committee, and reflects communications undertaken on behalf of the Committee by Eve Borenstein and Jennifer Reynoso:

We have learned the following from the IRS on the topic of whether a Form 1023/1024 “preparer” must have a PTIN:

The TE/GE National Office has confirmed that it is the Office of Chief Counsel (Procedure & Administration) that administers the PTIN issues.  That Office’s position to date is that all forms filed with the IRS are considered a “tax return” for purposes of the PTIN requirement unless specifically exempted by Notice 2011-6.  Form 1023/1024 is not exempted at this time.  Thus, anyone compensated for preparing all or a substantial portion of a 1023 or 1024 (or supervising the preparation of a 1023/1024) is required to have a PTIN.  Note: Neither the Form 1023 nor 1024 requires preparers to post their name and PTIN on the Form but the preparer is required to have the PTIN.

Chief Counsel (Procedure & Administration) has indicated that they are open to comments as to what tax forms should and should not be on the list.  (Comments on the Notice’s listing of “forms” may be submitted to CC:PA:LPD:PR (Notice 2011-6), Room 5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044. Alternatively, taxpayers may submit comments electronically to [email protected]. Please include “Notice 2011-6” in the subject line of any electronic communications.)

Comments Off on PTINs for Form 1023/1024 PreparersTags:

Preserving Charitable Exemption

February 3rd, 2011 · California Exempt Status

Charities must file timely informational tax returns or risk losing their tax exempt status.  See the following article which was published in the January 2011 issue of California Lawyer.

Preserving Charitable Exemption, Reprinted and/or posted with the permission of Daily Journal Corp. (2011).

Comments Off on Preserving Charitable ExemptionTags:·

ABA Comments on Requirements for Tax-Exempt Hospitals

January 21st, 2011 · Uncategorized

The American Bar Association Section of Taxation and Health Law Section submitted comments regarding the application of new requirements imposed on tax-exempt hospitals by section 501(r), /2/ which was added to the Code by section 9007(a) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.  The following is the Executive Summary (without footnotes) from the January 20, 2011 comment letter.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Internal Revenue Service (the “Service”) issued Notice 2010-39.  The Notice solicits comments regarding the application of new requirements imposed on tax-exempt hospitals by section 501(r),  which was added to the Code by section 9007(a) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the “PPACA”).  Section 501(r) includes four new requirements that hospital organizations must meet to qualify as tax-exempt organizations described in section 501(c)(3). The PPACA also added new disclosure requirements relating to section 501(r).

These Comments include the following recommendations regarding guidance issued under section 501(r):

1. With respect to the requirement that hospital organizations conduct a community health needs assessment (“CHNA”), we recommend that hospital organizations be allowed to build upon the many existing CHNA programs at the state and local level and that the Service consider identifying specific state CHNA provisions as safe harbors for complying with the CHNA requirement.

2. With respect to the requirement that hospital organizations make reasonable efforts to determine whether an individual is eligible for financial assistance before engaging in extraordinary collection actions, we recommend that:

(a) a hospital organization be deemed to have made reasonable efforts if it has either (i) obtained a written acknowledgment that the individual does not want to be considered for financial assistance or (ii) sent to the individual at least three notices stating that it has a financial assistance policy and providing information on how to apply for assistance; and

(b) the term “extraordinary collection actions” be defined (i) to exclude making a report to a credit rating agency or engaging a collection agent and (ii) to require that the action involve a judicial or administrative procedure under state law that would affect the individual or the property of the individual.

3. With respect to the effect of section 501(r) on the section 501(c)(3) status of a hospital organization, we recommend that:

(a) a good faith interpretation and compliance period be provided to organizations subject to the section 501(r) requirements, until final guidance is issued by the Service under section 501(r);

(b) a facts and circumstances test, similar to the one used under section 4958 to determine whether an excess benefit transaction should be treated as private inurement warranting revocation of section 501(c)(3) status, be used to determine whether a failure to comply with section 501(r) warrants revocation of section 501(c)(3) status, taking into account substantial compliance with section 501(r) and the organization’s other exempt activities;

(c) if a hospital organization fails the facts and circumstances test and is not in substantial compliance with section 501(r), the hospital organization be reclassified as an organization exempt under section 501(c)(4); and

(d) existing law allowing a donor to rely on the Service’s published listing of tax-exempt organizations to determine the deductibility of contributions apply as well to any hospital organization that loses its section 501(c)(3) status under section 501(r).

4. With respect to the application of section 501(r) to hospital organizations that operate multiple hospital facilities, we recommend that:

(a) the tests recommended above also be applied in determining the tax-exempt status of separate hospital facilities;

(b) if and to the extent failure to comply with section 501(r) results in section 501(c)(4) status for one or more facilities but not the hospital organization as a whole, an approach similar to that in section 150(b)(3) be applied to address the treatment of tax-exempt bonds; and

(c) existing Regulations on changes of use be applied and the “safe harbor” protection of section 141 be expanded to include the failure to satisfy 501(r) and specific authorization be provided for rulings under Revenue Procedures 2010-1 and 1993-17 to address changes of use.

5. With respect to the requirement that hospital organizations limit amounts charged to individuals eligible for financial assistance “to not more than the amounts generally billed” to individuals with insurance coverage, we recommend that:

(a) hospitals be given flexibility in determining the “amounts generally billed,” although using the Medicare rate is the simplest alternative when a Medicare rate is available;

(b) the Medicare rate be the actual Medicare rate used by the hospital, as adjusted for regional differences;

(c) for services that are not covered by Medicare, hospitals have the option of using either the Medicare rate for the nearest equivalent service or a discount that is determined by comparing the aggregate amount paid by Medicare for services covered by Medicare to the hospital’s chargemaster rates for these same services;

(d) a hospital basing the amounts billed to financial assistance recipients on its “best” rates, have several options for determining this amount, including (i) the actual lowest rate, regardless of insurer, if the hospital is able to make this determination or (ii) a blended rate of the actual rates offered by the insurer who on average pays the lowest rates;

(e) a hospital basing the amounts billed to financial assistance recipients on an average of its three “best” rates, be permitted to select the three best rates using one of the options for selecting the lowest rate and have the option to use a simple or a weighted average or to base the amounts on the rates billed to the insurers who cover a majority of the hospital’s patient base;

(f) the amounts generally billed provision apply to any person who is eligible for financial assistance as well as any further discounts provided under the hospital’s financial assistance policy; and

(g) a hospital organization has the option of excluding outpatient services when determining amounts generally billed.

6. With respect to the requirement that a hospital organization make its CHNA widely available to the public and the requirement that a hospital organization widely publicize its financial assistance policy, we recommend that the Service provide:

(a) a safe harbor stating that a hospital organization makes its CHNA widely available to the public if it makes the CHNA available for public inspection without charge at its principal, regional, and district offices during regular business hours and either (i) provides a physical copy upon request or (ii) makes the CHNA widely available through an Internet posting;

(b) a safe harbor stating that a hospital organizations has widely publicized its written financial assistance policy within the community it serves if it uses the procedures mentioned in the foregoing paragraph and makes the policy available in a manner consistent with examples included in the instructions to Form 990, Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax, Schedule H, Hospitals; and

(c) if a hospital organization does not satisfy these safe harbors, its compliance with the widely available to the public requirement would be evaluated based on all of the facts and circumstances.

7. With respect to the requirement that a hospital organization have a written policy requiring it to provide emergency medical care without discrimination and without regard to eligibility for financial assistance, we recommend that the organization be considered to satisfy this requirement if its written policy states that it will follow the procedures set forth in section 1867 of the Social Security Act, without discrimination and regardless of an individual’s ability to pay for such care.

8. With respect to the new statutory reporting and disclosure requirements imposed on hospital organizations, we recommend that:

(a) the term “hospital” be defined for section 501(r) reporting purposes in the same manner that “hospital” is currently defined in the instructions for Form 990, Schedule H; and

(b) any new reporting and disclosure requirements relating to section 501(r) be contained in a separate part of Schedule H and not be effective until tax years beginning after March 23, 2012.

Comments Off on ABA Comments on Requirements for Tax-Exempt HospitalsTags:

Review of Media-Based Ministries

January 14th, 2011 · Uncategorized

Senate Finance Committee member Charles Grassley staff has released a staff report on the results of his three-year inquiry into the financial practices of six media-based Christian ministries.  Senator Grassley is known for his focus on the financial practices of high-profile nonprofit organizations.  See the following link.

This staff report contains appendixes.  Appendix A sets forth the background for the creation of the Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability (ECFA).  Appendix B summarizes the Jim and Tammy Faye Bakker Case.

Appendix C contains a list of these issues specific to churches and religious organizations.  These include:  advisory committee for churches and religious organizations, parsonage allowances, IRS filing requirements, church tax inquiries and section 4958 excise taxes.

Appendix D contains a list of issues raised by the staff review of churches and religious organizations but are actually applicable to all 501(c)(3) charitable organizations, and in the case of excess benefit transactions, to organizations exempt under sections 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) of the tax code.  The issues include:  governance and self-dealing and excess benefit transactions

Appendix E is captioned: “Eliminate or Circumscribe Electioneering Prohibition.”   The following is the staff description of this appendix:

“The electioneering prohibition imposed on charities puts the IRS in a very difficult position as it juxtaposes tax-exemption requirements with freedom of speech limitations. With respect to churches and religious organizations, many may view such free speech limitations as a violation of constitutional principles. IRS enforcement of this prohibition can never be effective as IRS agents rarely witness violations of the prohibition. As a result, the IRS has to rely on third party referrals. Auditing violations of this prohibition essentially boil down to the IRS refereeing who said what, when. While political activity was not a central issue raised in the review of the media based ministries, it is one of the greatest sources of tension between the IRS and religious organizations. As a result, we thought it appropriate to consider this issue and seek input on how to amend these rules while seeking input on the other tax issues. Appendix E contains a description of the current law.

For the tax issues presented, a discussion of the present law and a description of the issue also are included. The questions we raise are not exclusive or comprehensive, as we expect those responding to the issues to raise further questions.”

Comments Off on Review of Media-Based MinistriesTags:··

IRS Increased Focus on 501(c)(4), (5) and (6) Organizations

December 22nd, 2010 · Federal Income Taxes

In the IRS EO Update dated December 15, 2010, the IRS released its FY 2011 Implementing Guidelines. The IRS states on page 26 that, “EO will continue to invest time in both new and ongoing initiatives in order to keep up with the ever-changing exempt organization sector.  The following excerpt (page 28) from the Guideline:

Section 501(c)(4), (5) and (6) Organizations. In recent years, our examination program has concentrated on section 501(c)(3) organizations. Beginning in FY 2011, we are increasing our focus on section 501(c)(4), (5) and (6) organizations. With the additional information available on the new Form 990, we will look at issues including political activity, inurement and the extent of compliance with the requirements for tax exemption by organizations that self-identified themselves as a section 501(c)(4), (5) or (6) organization.

Comments Off on IRS Increased Focus on 501(c)(4), (5) and (6) OrganizationsTags:

Franchise Tax Board Notification of New Filing Requirement

December 17th, 2010 · California Exempt Status, California filings

Before SB 401, most tax-exempt organizations with gross receipts normally equal to or less than $25,000 did not have a filing requirement.  Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2010, small tax-exempt organizations with gross receipts normally equal to or less than $25,000 (except churches) are now required to electronically file FTB 199N, California e-Postcard (available January 3, 2011).

In Public Service Bulletin 10-34 (November 23, 2010), the FTB advised that their exempt organizations unit started mailing approximately 240,000 Forms FTB 3751, New Reporting Requirements for Small Tax-Exempt Organizations, to existing tax-exempt organizations to inform them of a new electronic filing requirement.

Comments Off on Franchise Tax Board Notification of New Filing RequirementTags:

IRS Revocation of Exemptions: Current Efforts; Post-October 15; Revocation; Contributions and Tax Deductions; Reinstatement; On-Going Education; Compliance Review.

December 15th, 2010 · Federal Income Taxes, Loss of Tax-Exempt Staus

In the IRS EO Update dated December 15, 2010, the IRS released its FY 2011 Implementing Guidelines.   The following excerpt from the Guidelines is captioned:  Spotlight:  Filing Relief Program:

Background: The Pension Protection Act of 2006 made two important changes affecting tax-exempt organizations, effective the beginning of 2007. First, it requires all tax-exempt organizations, other than churches and church-related organizations, must file an annual return with the IRS. That includes small tax exempt organizations with gross receipts of $25,000 or less and had not previously had a filing requirement. They now are required to submit a Form 990-N, also known as an e-Postcard. Second, it mandates that any tax-exempt organization that fails to file for three consecutive years automatically loses it federal tax-exempt status.

Current Efforts: The first three-year filing deadline that could trigger revocation for failure to file was May 17, 2010. Despite an extensive outreach effort for the past three years, once the filing date arrived, the IRS realized that many organizations continued to be unaware of the tax law changes. On May 18, Commissioner Shulman announced that the IRS would provide additional guidance to help these small organizations maintain their tax-exempt status—even if they had missed the filing deadline. The Commissioner encouraged them  to continue filing and reassured them that the IRS would do what it could to help them avoid losing their tax-exempt status.

On July 26, 2010, the IRS announced a one-time two-part relief program to bring these small nonprofit organizations back into compliance. First, the program extended the filing deadline to October 15 for the smallest organizations, those eligible to file the Form 990-N, the e-Postcard. Second, it provided for a voluntary compliance program for those eligible to file the Form

990-EZ for the past three years. Under this program, an organization had to file its three delinquent returns and pay a small fee by October 15. Form 990 and 990-PF filers were not eligible to participate in this program. The IRS posted a list of the names and last-known addresses of more than

300,000 at risk organizations with filing due dates from May 17 through October 15, 2010, and no record of having filed a required annual return or notice for 2007, 2008 or 2009.

Immediately following the Commissioner’s announcement, the IRS expanded its outreach efforts to alert the tax-exempt sector of the relief program. As a result, during the Filing Relief Program (between May 18 and October 15), more organizations filed 990-Ns than during the previous five-month period.

Post-October 15: Eligible organizations that properly filed according to the Filing Relief Program will remain tax exempt.

Revocation: By operation of law, organizations that failed to file annual information returns for three consecutive years, and organizations eligible to participate in the filing relief program that failed to do so by the October 15 deadline, automatically will be revoked as of the original due date of their third return. In early 2011, the IRS will notify these organizations, and will publish their names by posting a list of revoked organizations on IRS.gov. Each month, as subsequent filing due dates pass, the IRS will expand the list to include the names of additional organizations that are revoked for failure to file for three consecutive years.

Contributions and tax deductions: Donors who contribute to organizations otherwise eligible to receive tax-deductible contributions can continue to take a tax deduction until the IRS publishes the name of the organization on the list of revoked organizations. A contribution to an organization listed on the IRS site as having lost its tax-exempt status is not tax deductible.

Reinstatement: An organization that wishes to retain its tax-exempt status must apply to have its tax-exempt status reinstated, even if it was not originally required to file an application for exemption. To do so, it must:

• File either Form 1023 or 1024, as appropriate;

• Pay the appropriate user fee; and

• Write automatically revoked on the top of the application and envelope.

EO Determinations will review the applications received in the normal course of business.

On-going Education: EO will continue its aggressive educational program to alert tax-exempt organizations of their annual filing requirements and the consequences of not filing.

Compliance Review: EO will conduct a compliance review of organizations that filed a Form 990-N but previously reported financial activity indicated they were ineligible to do so.

Comments Off on IRS Revocation of Exemptions: Current Efforts; Post-October 15; Revocation; Contributions and Tax Deductions; Reinstatement; On-Going Education; Compliance Review.Tags:·

California Secretary of State – Business Filing Backlog and Business Information Modernization

December 10th, 2010 · California filings, California nonprofit law

The following e-mail was sent by California Secretary of State to attorneys on December 2, 2010 concerning the business filing backlog:

In October, businesses and organizations throughout California were kind enough to support my efforts to speed up the business filing process at the Secretary of State’s office.  My Business Information Modernization (BIM) Proposal received overwhelming bipartisan support in the State Legislature, and was included in the 2010-11 state budget.

I am pleased to report that less than two months after the state budget was signed, substantial progress on reducing the filing backlog has already been made.   Attached is an update with more detailed information about plans for the future, and how the BIM Proposal has already exceeded the forecasted amount of funds generated for the state’s General Fund while helping California businesses.

Thank you for your continued support.  If you have any questions, please contact my office at (916) 653-7244.

Sincerely,

Debra Bowen

Secretary of State

Comments Off on California Secretary of State – Business Filing Backlog and Business Information ModernizationTags: